Monday, January 30, 2017

#2 - The Impossible Fortress - Jason Rekulak


Source/Version: Netgalley copy - free for honest review

Score: 9/10

When you’re 14, the world seems enormous and choking all at once, the big “one day” plans far more interesting than your current maths class or boring neighbourhood. For Billy, school is a time to be thinking over his next bit of computer programming script, not work, and time at home means programming a strip poker game and hanging out with his best friends Clark and Alf. The guys decide to steal a Playboy magazine from a local shop, and the tale from there is epic – double crosses, castles, single mothers, evil principals, furious guard dogs, princesses in various requirements of saving, and a determined band of thieving heroes.

I cannot remember the last time a book tackled me back to my teens, threw off the years, dug up memories and rode off on its bike laughing. The Impossible Fortress absolutely delighted me, sucked me in from the first page and didn’t let go until I was breathless and checking my face for zits I was so firmly feeling in the 1980s. It’s an incredible ride; clever, honest, unflinching and emotive, perfectly capturing the frets and frisson of being a teen still at home and hungry for the world.

This was the second book I read in 2017, and I can tell that there’ll have to be an astonishingly brilliant story to knock The Impossible Fortress from my “Best of 2017” lists this year.

Literary/wordcraft discussion: The dialogue was whip fast, witty and a delight to read. The characters were well-developed, with human frailties and no stereotypical short cuts (the principal could be seen as overblown, but I’ve known principals like that so I call it believable and move on). The use of hand-drawn maps at points during the story was excellent, as was the programming code at the beginning of each chapter – I didn’t understand it but it added sinews and sweat to the shape and movement of the story. Dialogue and development was organic, deftly woven into the story so that exposition wasn’t necessary, as you felt you knew the guys, their in-jokes and nuances – which then meant that when they were surprised, you were too. The surprises were absolutely unexpected – I’d have to reread the book to identify any foreshadowing, but there was nothing heavy handed about the twists (I certainly didn’t see them coming, and they packed a punch when they landed).

Rated: PG-13 – discussion of sex, physical intimacy, violence and themes of personal responsibility, real-life repercussions, peer pressure, friendships and developing relationships.

Recommended to:
  • ·         Anyone who hopes their mother never knew everything they were getting up to as a 14-year-old
  • ·         Those who would like to remember their teens again, zits, crushes, frustrations and all
  • ·         Teenagers (all those I'm related to will get this book as a gift from me asap!)


Not recommended for:
  • ·         Anyone allergic to laughter
  • ·         Those still mortified by previous embarrassments
  • ·         Readers who think teens don’t think about sex (hint: you're 179008% wrong)


If you like the sound of this book, I also recommend Please Forgive Me, Leonard Peacock (Matthew Quick), The Sun is Also A Star (Nicola Yoon), Illuminae (Amie Kaufman & Jay Kristoff), The Serpent King (Jeff Zentner) and Exo (Steven Gould).

Thursday, January 26, 2017

Pre-2017 Reviews: Love Letters of the Angels of Death - Jennifer Quist

(First published at Segullah)
In every romantic relationship there are unspoken understandings and expectations. Who will do the dishes, who will choose Christmas gifts, who will kill the spiders, who will use all the hot water. Whose heart will be the heaviest at the end.
 “Even though you’re not quite a full year younger than me, neither of us doubts for an instant that you will outlive me. Maybe it’s based on nothing more intuitive than the fact that I’m the male in this marriage. But somehow, we both know that eventually you will be left alone with the two-hundred-pound unanswered question of my corpse.” (p.11)
Jennifer Quist’s “Love Letters of the Angels of Death” is (contrary to the Gothic-sounding title) a lyrical, rich love story between a husband and wife. The characters are full-blooded, incredibly vibrant and above all firmly, undeniably relatable. Nobody has piercing eyes, or heart-stopping features, this is real life. The wife is pregnant in several of the stories told, they argue, sneak kisses when the kids aren’t watching, they each have their pet peeves and morbid fascinations. What they have is each other, and an obviously deep, committed relationship which is their support and anchor through ordinary, difficult, crushingly difficult experiences.
 “He can’t speak but I hear him struggling – all breath and tears – miles and miles away.  And somehow, you know it all even though you can’t hear any of it. You’re leaning over me at the kitchen table while I’ve still got the phone held to my ear. Everyone knows angels lost their wings ages ago – back in the Renaissance, I’m pretty sure. We’ve outgrown the need for them ourselves and we’re each left with two arms in their place. You fold yours around my shoulders. They draw me against you. And you’re whispering my little brother’s name like a warm, wet prayer, your face pressed into the side of my neck.” (p. 55)
In our emailed interview , Quist wrote of the closeness of the relationship between the two main characters: “We talk about being “one” with our spouses but I sometimes wonder if many of us believe it’s something that can happen to us as we exist right now.  I think it can happen and I was hoping to write about what that kind of unity looks and feels like using these characters.  Oneness is among the deepest, most mystical aspects of our beliefs.  It’s a miracle we call down on ourselves.  And it eludes a mere intellectual explanation.  Fiction and storytelling help say what can’t be said.  Maybe that’s what ties them together — a miracle.”
Quist has a deft spin of phrase, humour and evocative imagery which lingers and chews on your imagination long after you have turned the page:
 “As an adult, my brother looks like me only toasted brown and buffed up for skilled manual labour. But as the child you met that afternoon, he was all knees and elbows and no personal space at all. He darted around you like a Cupid celebrating an emerging Venus – my own mildly heat-exhausted Venus, stepping out of the car and onto the grass.” (p. 54)
Quist crafts, builds, and conveys so much in a fistful of words:
 “On the other end of the phone, our Cupid is crashing in a heap of feathers and arrows.” (p. 55)
The story, characters and lushness of prose sucked me deep into “Love Letters of the Angels of Death”, and I read it all in three sittings, begrudging the time spent outside its pages. One question I couldn’t help thinking about while not reading it, was how to describe her novel to someone who would be put off by the title. Quist’s response?
“A team of us agonized over how to write the synopsis on the back cover and I don’t think I could do much better than that.  I would like people to understand it’s not a self-indulgent Gothic fantasy but a love story (though not a romance).  And it’s not a marriage manual either.  There’s no “we interrupt this story to bring you these important messages.””
“Love Letters of the Angels of Death” is an exploration of a couple’s understandings and expectations of each other, shared beautifully – dirt, laughter, quirks, grief and all – through a series of vignettes over the course of many years. We get to learn about the characters as we learn about anyone; in bits and pieces, in jokes and family folklore, in the ordinary and unexpected, in and out of chronological order. Themes dance and rumble through the novel (such as loss, remembrance, dedication and commitment), giving a depth and permanence to the story that is surprising, wonderful and luxurious, and makes the last page difficult to turn.
Quist’s book is a finalist for this round of Whitney Awards, and it is a powerhouse all on its own. For me, “Love Letters of the Angels of Death” is already firmly ensconced as the best book I have read in the last six months, and it will take seismic activity, an alien invasion AND some master-crafted literary marvel to make me even think of beginning to change my mind. Seriously, this is a gorgeous, beautiful piece of lyrical realism.
Read it, and be changed.
Recommended to:
  •  Anyone wanting to read a book
  • Anyone looking for strong, beautiful, realistic depictions of marriage, men and women
  • Enjoyers of gorgeous prose and imagery
Not recommended for:
  •  Anyone uncomfortable with the inevitable death of family members
  • Those who like their love stories to involve phrases like “His/her eyes were stunning pools of sapphire/molten chocolate/moon dust…”
Rated: PG – themes of death and loss

Pre-2017 Reviews: Beautiful Ruins - Jess Walter

(First published at Segullah)
I’m in my mid-semester uni break, and seem to be deficient in Vitamin Fiction. So I’m self-medicating with the (at last count) thirty-seven fiction books I have scattered around my bedroom. At the moment I’m glutting myself on magical, fantastical fare and while it’s not my usual preference, it is hitting the spot right now. Nothing serious, nothing challenging, just great reads and escapes, adventure and fun. What’s not to love about that?
I truly believe that while our brains and selves can hugely benefit from a healthy, varied diet of intelligent, thought provoking reading materials, there is also a time for a bit of sugary, light deliciousness.
I enjoyed Beautiful Ruins, by Jess Walter, for the people it introduced, the deft and beautiful turn of phrases, and the fact that I was sincerely hoping for a decent ending for two of the characters (which they got). It’s not all rainbows and glitter, but it is a charming and engaging read.
Beautiful Ruins starts in 1960’s Italy, during the filming of Cleopatra (has Elizabeth Taylor ever looked more beautiful than in that movie?), and jumps forward to recently, and back a bit, then repeats a few times. The USA and Britain also feature at times, but most of all the same characters flow onto the pages, around your fingertips and into your head so you don’t want to stop reading until you know every last technicoloured glorious detail.
This is definitely a love story, (one of my favourite quotes from the book – extracted below – is about love stories) but it’s not obviously a romance – it is definitely a book about friendship, and choices, and choosing good and better things.
This is a love story, Michael Deane says.
But, really, what isn’t?…
And the robot loves his mater, alien loves his saucer, Superman loves Lois, Lex, and Lana, Luke love Leia (till he finds out she’s his sister), and the exorcist loves the demon even as he leaps out the window with it, in full soulful embrace, as Leo loves Kate and they both love the sinking ship, and the shark – God, the shark loves to eat, which is what the Mafioso loves, too – eating and money and Paulie and omertá – the way the cowboy loves his horse, loves the corseted girl behind the piano bar, and sometimes loves the other cowboy, as the vampire loves light and neck, and the zombie – don’t even start with the zombie, sentimental fool; has anyone ever been more lovesick than a zombie, that pale, dull metaphor for love, all animal craving and lurching, outstretched arms, his very existence a sonnet about how much he wants those brains? This, too, is a love story.
Beautiful Ruins, by Jess Walter
Recommended to:
  • Anyone wanting an engaging – and not depressing – escape
  • Anyone wishing they were on the Italian coast
  • Those looking for some lovely imagery, depth and scenery in a story
Not recommended to:
  • Those currently or recently experiencing a romantic break up or loss of humour
  • Anyone confused or irritated by changes in chronology
  • Anyone who prefers their fiction to be strictly by Russian, dead and/or angst-driven authors
  • Those who prefer their books to weigh more than their chair.
Rated: PG 15+ (high level language [f-bombs present throughout], marriage breakdowns, family strife, Hollywood chaos)

Pre-2017 Reviews: The Martian - Andy Weir


(First published at Segullah)
Mark Watney is not having a good day.
It started out great: he’s on Mars, part of a manned mission of exploration.
His day got a bit worse: A savage storm blows in, its intensity and size enough to warrant the crew deciding to ditch the mission. Immediately.
Promptly went awful: Mark gets hit by a piece of communication equipment, and his suit is punctured. He flatlines.
Absolute worst: The crew scrambles to evacuate, abandoning Mars and Mark’s body.
Only thing is, Mark is still alive.
But he’s the only person who knows. He has to survive his injury, get back inside shelter, and work out what to do next.
The Martian is one of the few books in the last year that has had me sneaking paragraphs and pages at every opportunity. More telling is the number of times I grabbed whichever son was nearest to read aloud a particularly wonderful snippet – it’s been years since I’ve done that!
While being mostly set on Mars, The Martian  is far more an action filled adventure than science-fiction. There is science, of course – it’s a book about astronauts and Mars, of course there’s science! – but any detailed science is explained smoothly and easily in the course of the story.
“The oxygenator will turn it [CO2] into oxygen in its own time.
Then, I’ll release hydrazine, very slowly, over the iridium catalyst, to turn it into N2 and H2. I’ll direct the hydrogen to a small area and burn it.
As you can see, this plan provides many opportunities for me to die in a fiery explosion.
Firstly, hydrazine is some serious death. If I make any mistakes, there’ll be nothing left but the “Mark Watney Memorial Crater” where the Hab [Habitat] once stood.
Presuming I don’t f*** up with the hydrazine, there’s still the matter of burning hydrogen. I’m going to be setting a fire. In the Hab. On purpose.
If you asked every engineer at NASA what the worst scenario for the Hab was, they’d all answer “fire”. If you asked them what the result would be, they’d answer “death by fire.”
Not only is The Martian a gripping read, told mostly from Mark’s diary entries, but it’s carrying a whole lot of humour, dry wit, determination and emotional impact as well. Mark’s efforts on Mars are interspersed with the fallout on the crew (still months from landing back on Earth) and within NASA. There is some swearing (c’mon, he’s stranded on Mars without means of escape or long-term food supply, who wouldn’t curse?) but there’s also disco, heartache, refusal to give up, adventure and a guarantee that you will never, ever look at a potato the same way again.
Rated: PG – intermittent swearing, survival and mature themes
Recommended to:
  • The adventurous (at heart, in reality, in books read)
  • Anyone wanting a thrilling, exciting read
  • Stargazers, adrenalin junkies, scientific-bent types
  • Potato farmers
  • McGuyver fans and wannabes
Not recommended for:
  • Agoraphobes
  • Claustrophobes
  • Strictly “romance-only” readers
  • Anyone on medical advice to stay calm and relaxed

Monday, January 23, 2017

#1 – A Song for Issy Bradley – Carys Bray



Source/Version: Library – recommended by Tracey Allen of Carpe Librum

Score: 6.5/10

An LDS family of six starts an ordinary Saturday, only for their world to tumble to pieces when the youngest child dies. Told over multiple months and from the points of view of all the remaining family members, this is an exquisite consideration of the messy, hilarious and crushing complications and effects of grief personally, within a family, and on faith.

I usually find books which try to deal with grief AND faith to be heavy handed, humourless and simpering sincerely that prayer really IS the answer to the awfulness of the tragedy being experienced – like being stuck in a room painted in some bland Celestial Off-White gloop until you finish the book or throw it across the room in disgust or misery. A Song For Issy Bradley is, in comparison, coming out of your bedroom one morning to find your loungeroom has been spray-painted to show a gorgeous sunset above your entire neighbourhood’s smouldering ruins.

The characters are the dad, who is the Bishop of the congregation, his wife who is constantly reminded she is a convert (more than a decade ago), their teenage daughter and son, and the youngest son and daughter who are both in primary school. The expectations of their church community are realistically depicted, as well as the movement of ebbs and flows, doubts and habits, prayer and observances throughout all the family in different amounts and ways.

In fact, this book has the best response to the appalling sexual purity lessons often taught, and is one I will no doubt be quoting and using in the future:

Sister Campbell likes object lessons… Last night she reached into her home-made scripture case to pull out a stick of Wrigley’s Doublemint gum. ‘Who would like this?’
No one said anything. Everyone suspected a trick. 
‘You would, wouldn’t you, Zipporah?’
Zippy shook her head but then though better of it and nodded. Sister Campbell stripped away the foil wrapping, put the gum in her own mouth and chewed loudly. 
‘Mmm. Delicious.’ She reached into her mouth and pulled out the chewed gum. ‘There you are Zipporah,’ she said. ‘Come on up and get it, it’s all yours.’ 
Zippy gave a surprised laugh and a couple of other people joined in. 
‘It’s no laughing matter. These are the fruits of sexual immorality.’ Sister Campbell held the gum out and shook her hand for emphasis. ‘Who wants the dirty, chewed gum?’ 
The laughter stopped. Mum whispered something to Dad, who shook his head. Mum poked him, and when he ignored her, she stood up. Zippy assumed she was popping out to go to the loo, but she stepped forward and joined Sister Campbell. They stood side by side, Mum nervously twizzling her wedding ring as Sister Campbell’s face set into an expression hard enough to chop wood. 
Mum’s voice trembled and the air in the room was suddenly thinned by held breath. ‘I don’t mean to cause contention, but…’ She grabbed the sticky ball from Sister Campbell’s fingers and put it into her mouth. 
Everyone breathed out at once. 
‘Yum,’ Mum said, her jaw working determinedly. She looked like a contestant from I’m a Celebrity, munching on a testicle. ‘Repentance is delicious. Forgiveness tastes wonderful, too. You’d never know anyone had eaten this before. It’s still lovely and minty.’ 
Sister Campbell’s cheeks went red and she held out her hand, but Mum ignored her and carried on chomping. Finally, she removed the gum from her mouth and placed it on Sister Campbell’s upturned palm. Then she sat back down beside Dad. 
Sister Campbell held her hand out. ‘Would anyone else like a chew?'
Poor Sister Valentine was in agony. She looked from Sister Campbell to Mum and back again, uncertain as to whether it was best to emphasise the cleansing power of repentance or the diabolical nature of sin. (p. 28-30)

A Song For Issy Bradley captures family tensions, expectations, politics and disappointments well, without laziness or use of stereotype. The religious observances and faith of the family is not explained away or used as a proselyting tool – there is no heavy-handed message for the reader to have stamped in their forehead as they read. Love, faith and grief are presented in their natural, messy, complicated and encompassing forms, with a welcome lack of Sunday School answers or happily ever afters.

She should beg and plead, find the right words; words that will release the magic of healing and bind Issy tomortality before it's too late, but all she can think of is please. Please, please, please... So feeble, she knows it won't work. She needs more, a game-changing word, one she can shout through the hospital ceiling to the deity that is preparing to steal her daughter. A word like Rumpelstiltskin, a word which will overpower and break him. (p. 64)
There should be stories where the answer is no. There should be stories where children pray for lost rabbits that never turn up and then people might get used to it and know what to do next: he doesn’t know. He has prayed and blessed and waited, he’s done everything you have to do to get a miracle. If he can’t bring Issy back, the only way to see her again is to be good for his whole, entire life, which means he’s go to fix his lie. (p. 406)

Every family member’s grief is given consideration, nobody’s experience is dismissed due to age, emotion, responsibilities or understanding – and this is what gives this novel such emotive punch.

‘Dad?’
‘Yes?’
‘Issy’s going to be dead for my whole, entire life, isn’t she?’
‘Yes.’
‘That’s sad, isn’t it?’
Ian can’t trust his voice. He nods.
‘Dad?’
‘Yes?’
‘I know I’ll see her again and everything, but I’ll be grown up by then, so it’s not that good, is it? We were going to get grown up together, and now I’ll be getting grown up by myself.’
Perhaps if he was a better Bishop, a better father, he would know what to say. (p. 414)

A Song For Issy Bradley surprised me. It deftly avoids the easy path of platitudes and bland encouragements, instead it sinks down into the mud of a family’s grief and shows each handful, bugs, snot and all. It’s not a comfortable read, but tales of loss and tragedy shouldn’t be comfortable. It is painful, and funny, and pinches in unexpected places, like good, honest stories do.

Literary/wordcraft notes:
The use of chapters/sections for different points of view was effective, and the individual tone for each family member was deftly done. The voices of the family’s four children were obviously different to those of the parents, both in complexity of thought and with frames of reference and description (‘Issy… wonders if part of her has popped in the night, like a balloon.’ p. 18). The use of third person omniscient narrative added clarity (in terms of who’s point of view is being read), as well as an unbiased distance which allowed all characters to be considered and examined equally.

No assumption was made as to the reader’s knowledge of theology, or even of LDS Doctrine, so while there was no pause-for-prolonged-explanation, neither was there skirting around fundamental doctrines or practises – the reader was given only the information that the character would think/say. This is one of the best “faith in real life with no exposition” I’ve read.

Rated: PG14 – big issues like death, grief, parental mistakes, faith struggles, guilt and humanity.

Recommended to:
Anyone who sees more greys in life than black or white
Those who aren’t threatened by those who see more greys in life than black or white
Anyone who sees faith as living and encompassing, not static and strict
Those who know – or are coming to know – life is a beautiful, painful, gorgeous mess
Those who like reality and human-ness in their fiction
Bookclubs which aren't afraid of discussion

Not recommended for:
Anyone who believes “You just need to pray/fast/hope/believe/eat organic/repent more” is absolutely perfect as an answer to any trial/tragedy/headache/heartbreak/doubt
Those who like happily-ever-after stories, tied up in sweet little bows
Anyone who doesn’t have someone to talk to about books they’re reading – you’ll want to discuss this one (if you don’t have anyone, I’ll talk books with you!)

If you like the sound of this book, I also recommend:
Prayers for Sale – Sandra Dallas
Love Letters of the Angels of Death – Jennifer Quist
Perfect Neighbors –DeAnne Neilson

Categories:

Death, grief, families, LDS characters, faith

Saturday, December 7, 2013

Murder in Mississippi, by John Safran

It’s been over ten years since John Safran first exploded onto my radar in his hilarious and confronting John Safran’s Music Jamboree. While the brilliance and daring of that show has stuck with me (as well as snippets from his subsequent documentaries and shows) it was with some hesitation that I approached his debut book, Murder in Mississippi. Hesitant not because it was a true crime book, but because my previous exposure to Safran’s work showed a certain bulldozer subtlety when it came to him presenting what he saw as the facts and motivations of those he interviewed.

If Safran’s television work is his wielding of a bulldozer, Murder in Mississippi is his driving through the Dandenong Ranges in a sleek, responsive luxury car; powering through corners, coasting for the scenic reveals, and performing perfect handbrake turns in gravel to get the adrenalin pumping. In short, Murder in Mississippi is exhilarating, stunning and leaves you unsure which way is up or out when you’re done.

It’s an odd premise for a book, summarised succinctly on the cover “The true story of how I met a white supremacist, befriended his black killer and wrote this book.” Already Murder in Mississippi was sounding a little surreal and quirky like Safran’s previous work, but curiosity had me opening the book and fascination had me reading it at 0315 in the morning.

A quick synopsis: Safran met Richard Barrett (the white supremacist) while filming Race Relations, toured his offices, attended an awards ceremony and then pulled a stunt that is jaw-dropping in its intent and bravado. A year later Barrett was murdered by a young black man named Vincent. Murder in Mississippi details the history between Safran and Barrett, and then chronicles Safran’s travel to Mississippi (passive-aggressive airport signs and all); his meeting of key law officials, the accused’s family, white supremacists, black journalists/activists and assorted Southerners, all before he is contacted by the confessed murderer, Vincent. Transcribed telephone conversations between Safran and Vincent are included, and are a source of bafflement and fascination for both Safran and the reader in trying to work out how a man ended up dead and another ended up back behind bars.

Through the weirdness, the zigzagging opinions and lack of easy answers in Murder in Mississippi, Safran’s prose is liquid, sharp, surprising, precise – like cutting your tongue on a piece of ice in your drink. He shares his confusion, amusement and stubbornness at the proceedings and spectacles he is part of in Mississippi – he also presents his own conclusions and observations with a subtlety, clarity, depth, humour and consideration that make Murder in Mississippi an outstanding debut, as well as a phenomenal true crime and humanistic read.

Recommended to:   Bigots, racists and close-minded individuals (wishful thinking, I know)
Humans over the age of twelve (eight with some careful omissions)
Readers of engaging, thought-provoking books
True-crime genre novices to aficionados

Not recommended for:   Bigots, racists and close-minded individuals (realistically and sadly)
Pollyanna-type personalities
People who are allergic to laughing
Anyone who cried during Milo & Otis or any tissue product advertisement

Rated: PG (some vulgar slang, racist comments, and frank, mature discussion of racism and stereotypes)


Note: I was absolutely delighted to be part of a combined interview Q&A with Murder in Mississippi author John Safran and other Murder in Mississippi readers through The Reading Room – watch it here.